ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the Diet Quality Index (DQI) and the Physical Activity (PA) levels associated with adequacy of gestational weight gain in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). A total of 172 pregnant women with a single fetus and a diagnosis of GDM participated. Food intake was self-reported on the food frequency questionnaire and DQI was quantified using the index validated and revised for Brazil (DQI-R). To assess PA, the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered. Gestational weight gain was classified, following the criteria of the Institute of Medicine, into adequate (AWG), insufficient (IWG), or excessive (EWG) weight gain. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed, with level of significance <0.05. The participants were divided into 3 groups: AWG (33.1%), IWG (27.3%), and EWG (39.5%). The analysis indicated that if the pregnant women PA fell into tertile 1 or 2, then they had a greater chance of having IWG, whereas those with the lowest scores on the DQI-R, whose PA fell into tertile 2, and pregestational obesity women had the greatest chance of having EWG. This study has shown that low PA levels may contribute towards IWG. On the other hand, a low final DQI-R score, representing inadequate food habits, low PA levels, and pregestational obesity may increase the chance of EWG in patients with GDM.
Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Exercise/physiology , Gestational Weight Gain/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Diet Surveys , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the retention of information after participation in multidisciplinary group in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) through a phone contact. METHOD: 122 pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes were included. After diagnosis of gestational diabetes, the patients were referred to the multidisciplinary group where they received medical, nutrition and nursing guidelines related to the disease. After three days these patients received one telephone call from a nurse, who made the same questions regarding the information received. In the statistical analysis, results were presented as absolute and relative frequencies. RESULTS: Most patients 119/122 patients (97.5%) were managing to do self glucose monitoring. Twenty-one patients (17.2%) reported having difficulty performing the blood glucose, especially finger pricking. When questioning whether the woman was following the proposed diet, 24/122 (19.7%) patients said they did not; the meal frequency was not reached by 23/122 (18.9%) of the women, and forty-seven (38.5%) of the women reported having ingested sugar in the days following the guidance in multidisciplinary group. CONCLUSION: Regarding the proposed treatment, there was good adherence of patients, especially in relation to blood glucose monitoring. As for nutritional control, we observed greater difficulty in following the guidelines demonstrating the need for long-term monitoring, as well as further clarification to the patients about the importance of nutrition in diabetes management.
Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Capillaries , Diet, Diabetic/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Retention, Psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the retention of information after participation in multidisciplinary group in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) through a phone contact. Method: 122 pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes were included. After diagnosis of gestational diabetes, the patients were referred to the multidisciplinary group where they received medical, nutrition and nursing guidelines related to the disease. After three days these patients received one telephone call from a nurse, who made the same questions regarding the information received. In the statistical analysis, results were presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Results: Most patients 119/122 patients (97.5%) were managing to do self glucose monitoring. Twenty-one patients (17.2%) reported having difficulty performing the blood glucose, especially finger pricking. When questioning whether the woman was following the proposed diet, 24/122 (19.7%) patients said they did not; the meal frequency was not reached by 23/122 (18.9%) of the women, and forty-seven (38.5%) of the women reported having ingested sugar in the days following the guidance in multidisciplinary group. Conclusion: Regarding the proposed treatment, there was good adherence of patients, especially in relation to blood glucose monitoring. As for nutritional control, we observed greater difficulty in following the guidelines demonstrating the need for long-term monitoring, as well as further clarification to the patients about the importance of nutrition in diabetes management.
RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a retenção de informações, após participação em grupo multiprofissional, em pacientes com diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG), por meio de contato telefônico. Método: foram incluídas 122 gestantes com diagnóstico de DMG. Após o diagnóstico, as pacientes eram encaminhadas ao grupo multiprofissional para receber orientações médicas, nutricionais e de enfermagem relacionadas à doença. Após três dias, as pacientes receberam um contato telefônico de um enfermeiro, que realizou perguntas relacionadas às informações recebidas. Na análise estatística, os resultados foram apresentados em frequências absolutas e relativas. Resultados: a maioria das pacientes, 119/122 (97,5%), estava conseguindo fazer a automonitorização glicêmica. Vinte e uma pacientes (17,2%) referiram ter dificuldades para realizar a glicemia capilar, sendo a principal relacionada às lancetas. Quanto à dieta proposta, 24/122 (19,7%) referiram que não estavam conseguindo cumprir; o fracionamento da dieta não foi alcançado por 23/122 (18,9%) das gestantes e 47 (38,5%) relataram ter ingerido açúcar nos dias seguintes à orientação do grupo multiprofissional. Conclusão: em relação ao tratamento proposto, houve boa adesão das pacientes, especialmente quanto à automonitorização glicêmica. Em relação aos controles nutricionais, observamos maior dificuldade no seguimento das orientações, mostrando haver necessidade de seguimento em longo prazo e de fornecer melhor esclarecimento às pacientes sobre a importância da nutrição no controle do diabetes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Retention, Psychology , Capillaries , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Interviews as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Longitudinal Studies , Diet, Diabetic/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
A Diabetes Mellitus Gestacional é definida como intolerância à glicose durante a gestação, excluídos os casos de diabetes pré-gestacional. A telemedicina tem sido citada como ferramenta útil para proporcionar melhor qualidade à saúde de portadores de doenças crônicas. Objetivo: analisar a influência da orientação telefônica feita por um profissional de saúde sobre os resultados da automonitorização glicêmica em pacientes com diabetes mellitus gestacional. Método: estudo randomizado controlado-cego, longitudinal, com gestantes diagnosticadas com diabetes gestacional, acompanhadas no Setor de Endocrinopatias e Gestação da Clínica Obstétrica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo atendidas no período de agosto de 2012 a maio de 2014. O diagnostico de DMG foi realizado por meio de glicemia de jejum e teste de tolerância à glicose de 75 gramas. As pacientes foram convidadas a participar da pesquisa após receberem instruções de uma equipe multiprofissional. Foram alocadas, de acordo com a randomização em dois grupos: Grupo 1 (receberiam ligação telefônica três dias após as orientações multiprofissionais, n=122) e grupo 2 (não receberiam ligação telefônica n= 122),. A enfermeira ligou para as pacientes e aplicou questionário sobre manuseio do aparelho para verificação da glicemia capilar, dieta, horário de aferições, desconforto e dificuldade em realizar a automonitorização glicêmica. Foram analisados os valores glicêmicos por meio das porcentagens de valores alterados, de hiperglicemia, de hipoglicemia e da média glicêmica nos sete primeiros dias após a participação no grupo multiprofissional. O número de aferições glicêmicas e as respostas ao questionário aplicado durante o contato telefônico também foram analisados. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos quanto à cor, idade, presença de outras doenças clínicas maternas e quanto ao tipo de teste usado para diagnóstico de diabetes...
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as glucose intolerance during pregnancy, excluding cases of pre-gestational diabetes. Telemedicine has been cited as useful tool to provide better quality health care for patients with chronic diseases. Objective: To analyze the influence of telephone advice, by a health care professional, on the results of blood glucose monitoring in patients with gestational diabetes. Method: A randomized controlled blind trial, in pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes, attended in Setor de Endocrinopatias e Gestação da Clínica Obstétrica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo was carried out from August 2012 to May 2014 The diagnosis of GDM was made by means of fasting glucose and glucose tolerance test 75 grams. Patients were invited to participate in the study after receiving instructions from a multidisciplinary team. According to randomization, patients were allocated into two groups: Group 1 (receive phone call three days after multidisciplinary instructions, n = 122) and group 2 (not receive phone call, n = 122). The nurse called the patient and applied questionnaire on handling the device for checking blood glucose, diet, time of measurements, discomfort and difficulty in performing the blood glucose monitoring. Glycemic values were analyzed by means of the percentage of abnormal values, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and glycemic average in the first seven days after participation in the multidisciplinary group. The number of glucose measurements and the questionnaire answer questionnaire were also analyzed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding race, age, presence of other maternal medical illnesses and the type of test used to diagnose gestational diabetes. Analyzing the glycemic values , a group that received telephone guidelines showed lower percentage of abnormal values (p = 0.001), lower incidence of...
